3.1 After identification of potential cases for prosecution by the CPC – TDS in case of mandatory processing or otherwise, it should be entered in the ‘Prosecution register’ maintained in Form–C (page 74 of the Prosecution Manual) and to be reported to the CIT(TDS) who shall also maintain the prosecution register in Form–D (page 75 of the Prosecution Manual). Till a specific module in CPC-TDS is made functional for having control on prosecution proceedings, the entries may be made in manual register.
3.2 Following information/documents regarding the deductor may be collected by the AO(TDS) once the case is identified for processing :
(a) Details of the company/ firm/ individual
|
Name of |
the |
company/ |
Present |
PAN |
TAN |
|
firm/individual |
address |
Number |
Number |
(b) Details of its directors/ partners/ proprietor etc.
|
Name of Directors/ Partners/ Proprietor as applicable for the relevant year |
Date of birth |
PAN & residential address |
(c) Accounts of the deductor for the relevant year showing late payments.
(d) Copies of the TDS statement filed by assessee deductor.
(e) Copies of challans of late deposit of TDS by the assessee deductor.
(f) Copies of the intimations showing late payment interest for all the quarters of the relevant assessment year, if it is available.
(g) Copies of Audit report, if they show default.
(h) While collecting above information, AO(TDS) may also collect other details that may help the CIT(TDS) take a considered decision as also assist subsequent compounding proceedings (if any) viz. (a) whether the default was only in one year and no defaults took place later, (b) whether the deductor has himself rectified the mistake and deposited the tax along with interest prior to issue of notice by the department, (c) whether the same offence has been compounded earlier and if yes, how many time etc.
3.3 The AO(TDS) after collecting the above information/documents shall issue show cause notices to the person responsible for deduction (directors/principal officers/partners/members/ karta), within 45 days of receipt of the list of prosecutable cases from CPC-TDS in accordance with Sections 278B/278C r.w.s. 276B/276BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3.4 It may be ensured that the reply is furnished within 30 days of the issue of the show cause notice. In case no reply is furnished within 30 days, it shall be presumed that the person responsible for deduction has no cause to state and the matter may be pursued further.
3.5 The AO(TDS) shall examine the reasons/reply for non-compliance and will prepare the proposal in Form ‘F’ (as prescribed in Prosecution Manual) and send it to the CIT(TDS) through proper channel. Separate proposal should be submitted for separate assessment years. The Form ‘F’ will indicate inter alia, the following:
(a) The facts indicating the commission of offence.
(b) Chronology of events, primary & secondary evidences to establish the offence.
(c) Present stage of the proceedings relating to the commission of offence.
(d) List of documentary evidences including depositions, submissions to prove the offence.
(e) List of witnesses on which the departmental case depends.
(f) Any other facts or evidence to establish the offence.
(g) It has to be clearly mentioned in the proposal whether the offence is second or subsequent offence in terms of Section 278A.
An entry can be made by the AO(TDS) in the Form ‘C’ (manual register or the specific module for prosecution as and when developed on TRACES) as soon as the proposal is moved.
3.6 While the AO(TDS) will mandatorily refer all the cases of TDS default exceeding Rs.1 lakh to CIT(TDS), cases of defaults between Rs.25000-Rs.1lakh shall be referred to the CIT(TDS) only if he is satisfied that it is a case fit for prosecution. The report to CIT(TDS) shall be submitted within 60 days of the issue of show cause notice. Time granted to furnish the reply may be excluded from this time limit.
3.7The CIT(TDS) is the competent authority to accord sanction u/s 279(1). He shall:
1. If he is of the opinion that the case is prima facie fit for prosecution, then, issue show cause notice(s) to all proposed accused(s) u/s 276B/276BB r.w.s. 278B of the I.T. Act as to why sanction for launching of prosecution should not be accorded. The show cause notice can be generated from the online module on TRACES, as and when the facility is made available.
2. He shall after hearing the assessee and after proper application of mind clearly enunciate that while processing the cases for prosecution u/s 276B/276BB r.w.s. 278B, a fair and judicious view has been taken in view of the provisions of Section 278AA before filing the complaint(s). This should get reflected in both the sanction orders passed by the Commissioners/Directors under Section 279(1) and the complaints filed with the competent Courts:
3. There is no statutory requirement for obtaining opinion of the Counsel before granting sanction for prosecution. However, given the fact that TDS offences are technical in nature, such reference could be made in complex situations like identification of accused(s) etc to avoid legal infirmities in prosecution proposals/complaints. In such cases, it should be ensured that the opinion should be obtained from the Counsel within 30 days. If after examining the opinion of the Standing Counsel, he is satisfied that it is a fit case for prosecution, he shall pass a speaking order u/s 279(1) separately for each assessment year.
4. In case he is not satisfied after receiving reply, he shall drop the proceedings.
An entry shall be made by the CIT(TDS) in the prosecution register or in the utility as and when available in TRACES on passing of such orders as mentioned in para (b) above or as soon as the decision to drop proceedings is made. The CIT(TDS) shall complete the process and pass an order u/s 279 sanctioning prosecution or dropping the show cause notice within 60 days of receipt of the proposal.
3.8 The assessee deductor can at any stage of the proceedings, file a compounding application before the Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax/Chief Commissioner of Income-tax. Instruction vide F.No.285/35/2013-IT(Inv.V)/108 dt. 23.12.2014 should be followed in dealing with the compounding applications. If a person who has committed an offence(s) under S.276B/276BB files an application for compounding of the said offence(s), the application should be processed on priority basis and mandatorily be disposed off within the time frame as prescribed by the Central Action Plan guidelines. During the pendency of the compounding application, the CIT(TDS) shall keep the prosecution proposal pending. However, if the application is not decided within the prescribed time, the CIT(TDS) shall proceed to file the complaint. As soon as an application for compounding is moved, an entry should be made in the prosecution register maintained manually or in the utility as and when available in TRACES. Entries of subsequent action on compounding application shall also be made in such register.
3.9 The CIT(TDS) after according sanction u/s 279(1) shall send back the records to the authority seeking sanction with sanction order in duplicate, one for filing in the Court with complaint and other for the record.
3.10 The AO(TDS) shall, after entering receipt of the sanction order in the prosecution register maintained by him, ensure that the complaint is launched in the competent Court having jurisdiction over the place where the offence is committed.
3.11 The CIT(TDS) & the AO(TDS) shall both make an entry in the respective registers maintained manually or in the utility as and when available in TRACES.
3.12 Similarly, if any such prosecutable offence comes to light during the proceedings before the appellate authorities, revision authorities or any other proceedings, same shall also be treated at par with other prosecutable cases as enumerated under Chapter-XVII of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and action shall be initiated in accordance with procedure as laid vide this SOP.
TIME FRAME :-
4. The time period for the entire process from identification to passing of order u/s 279(1)/279(2) should be as under:
|
S.No. |
Section |
Time limit for submitting proposal |
Time limit for according sanction u/s |
Time limit for launching Prosecution |
Authority to |
|
1 |
276B |
Within 90 days of generation of list on |
Within 60 days of receipt of information from the AO(TDS) |
Within 30 days of receiving approval u/s 279(1) |
AO(TDS) having jurisdiction. |
|
2 |
276BB |
-do- |
-do- |
-do- |
-do- |
CA Jugraj Singh Bedi
JSBA Consulting Pvt Ltd
